Elizabeth Murray, emurray@ksu.edu1, Ralph Charlton, rcharlton@strongmuseum.org2, Gregory Zolnerowich, gregz@ksu.edu1, and Yoonseong Park, ypark@ksu.edu1. (1) Kansas State University, Department of Entomology, 123 West Waters Hall, Manhattan, KS, (2) Strong Museum, One Manhattan Square, Rochester, NY
Tarantulas in the south-central US region were historically included in one far-ranging species, Aphonopelma hentzi. Two subsequent studies, however, have split this original taxon into about ten new species. Unfortunately the majority of these putative species were named from only one or two specimens, with variability not taken into account. In order to reevaluate the taxonomic status of the A. hentzi and its peripheral species, we have examined over 100 specimens collected from a wide geographic area including the historical hentzi range. We utilized both molecular and morphological data for this study to give a more robust analysis of the hentzi tarantulas and the peripheral species. We focused on the mitochondrial DNA marker cytochrome oxidase I, where we found only a few or no polymorphisms among individuals in the historical hentzi distribution; in contrast, tarantulas outside of this range showed exceptionally high variation. The molecular data are used to develop a phylogeny of the tarantulas, which supports the hypothesis that the south-central Aphonopelma species should be consolidated. In addition, we found that variations in morphology of the specimens coincide with patterns of variation in the molecular data. We have found there is not adequate divergence for the historical Aphonopelma hentzi group of tarantulas to be considered ten separate species as it is presently.
Species 1: Araneae Theraphosidae
Aphonopelma hentzi
See more of
A3. Systematics, Morphology, and Evolution
See more of
Student Competition PosterSee more of
The 2006 ESA Annual Meeting, December 10-13, 2006
- From Roger Craig, Professor, UMass Medical School, September 21, 2007
We purchase tarantulas from Carolina Biological Supply for our research on muscle. Their website states that "Usually a brown tarantula from the southwestern United States is shipped", and they usually are a fairly dark brown. I am guessing that the species they send is Aphonopelma hentzi. I am checking with them, but I am not sure they know for sure. From your experience, can you tell me what you think is the most likely species we would be using - are there other species that come from that area? I am sorry - although we use tarantulas quite a bit, we are no experts on their taxonomy, although we would like to know as exactly as we can what species we are using. Thanks very much for any help you can give.
- From Zachary J. Valois, Undergraduate student, Salt Lake Community College, June 9, 2009
Hello,
let me first say that I am very happy to see somebody beginning to work on North American Theraphosids. Your work is a good start to cleaning up the uncertain pathways that these animals have followed. I am curious about your plans for the future.
My main question is why do you merit the synonymy of A. beargi?
If this specimen was indeed mis-labeled, then whatever that Mexican species is, remains A. baergi untill proved otherwise. As by common theory, a species is described from a specimen(s), not a population or locality of such. So, A. beargi, may be in the wrong genus, may be restricted to Mexico, and may be it's own species (or another currently described species), but in my opinion remains valid untill formally investigated and proved otherwise.
Thanks,
Zachary J. Valois