ESA Annual Meetings Online Program

Immune response of Lymantria dispar to naturally occurring intracellular pathogens

Monday, November 12, 2012: 10:27 AM
300 A, Floor Three (Knoxville Convention Center)
Gwyn L. Puckett , Department of Entomology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL
Leellen Solter , Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability, University of Illinois, llinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL
Marianne Alleyne , Department of Entomology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL
Although insects lack the adaptive immune system of vertebrates, they do possess a complex innate defense system. Recognition of foreign microbes leads to a series of defense actions including signal proteins, antimicrobial peptides, as well proteins involved in the phenoloxidase cascade that defend against invading pathogens. Although ecologically and physiologically relevant routes of infection are primarily oral ingestion or entry through the tracheal system or cuticle, models of the humoral immune response in insects are typically produced by injection of facultative bacteria, fungi or foreign objects into the host. Immune responses are key factors determining the level of susceptibility of hosts to their natural enemies but comparative studies are rare, primarily because hosts or their natural pathogens are not easily available or produced. We chose the European gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.) as our model species as its natural microbial enemies are well studied and available. We use a proteomic approach to study the induction of the immune response of the gypsy moth to its naturally occurring pathogens via oral ingestion, the microsporidia Vairimorpha disparis and Endoreticulatus schubergi, nuclear polyhedrosis virus, cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus, and the microbial pesticide Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki. Fourth instar larvae are inoculated and hemolymph collected at 8, 18, and 36 hours post inoculation. Protein expression and abundance are quantified through 2-D gel electrophoresis with computer-assisted analysis of 2-DE patterns thus permitting comparison of protein expression among treatments to determine if different pathogens with different host tissue targets induce differential expression of immune proteins.