Paul S. Robbins, psr1@cornell.edu, Steve M. Bogdanowicz, smb31@cornell.edu, Wendell L. Roelofs, wlr1@cornell.edu, and Richard G. Harrison, rgh4@cornell.edu. Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Entomology, Geneva, NY
The genus Phyllophaga (s. lato) in America north of Mexico embraces ca. 200 species in seven sub-genera ((P.) Phyllophaga, (P.) Phytalus, (P.) Listrochelus, (P.) Tostegoptera, (P.) Triodonyx, (P.) Cnemarachis, (P.) Chlaenobia). The taxonomic associations between these sub-genera have been a point of conflict among students of this genus for nearly 200 years. The relationships of the first five of these sub-genera are hypothesized using mtDNA sequences, male capture (sex attractant response) in vane traps when presented with a series of sex pheromones identified from several Phyllophaga species, and a comparison of genitalic groups. These results indicate that the monophyly of the sub-genus Phytalus as presently described is questionable. (P.) Phytalus obsoleta, although assigned to the sub-genus Phytalus on the basis of cleft tarsal claws, shares genitalic similarity, sex attractant responses and mtDNA sequence data with (P.) Phyllophaga crinita, a species without cleft claws. Those species in which males were captured exclusively in traps baited with the methyl esters of the essential amino acids L-valine and L-isoleucine form a monophyletic group encompassing the (P.) Phyllophaga (s. str.). The only two members of the sub-genus (P.) Tostegoptera, (P.) Tostegoptera lanceolata and (P.) Tostegoptera squamipilosa, form a monophyletic group based on genitalic similarities, mtDNA sequence, and male captures in the methyl ester of the essential amino acid L-leucine. This study demonstrates the utility in combining male responses to sex attractants with traditional characters for a more revealing analysis
Species 1: Coleoptera Scarabaeidae
Phyllophaga anxiaSpecies 2: Coleoptera Scarabaeidae
Phyllophaga lanceolataSpecies 3: Coleoptera Scarabaeidae
Phyllophaga crinitaKeywords: melolonthinae
See more of Student Competition for the President's Prize Display Presentations, Section A.
See more of Student Competition Poster
See more of The 2004 ESA Annual Meeting and Exhibition
- From Manuel Barrios, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, January 3, 2007
What kind of Phylogenetic analysis did you applied?
Did you used an outgroup? if yes, what was it?
Did you included all the species?
Do you consider that the subgenus should be elevated to genera or conservated? Why?