Sunday, 26 October 2003 - 3:00 PM
0170

This presentation is part of : Ten-Minute Papers, Section D. Medical and Veterinary Entomology

Comparative field evaluation of various plant infusions for collection of gravid Culex females in Alabama

Nathan Burkett and Gary R. Mullen. Auburn University, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, 301 Funchess Hall, Auburn, AL

As part of the current West Nile virus survey in Alabama a comparative field evaluation of gravid trap infusions from various sources was conducted at Tuskegee National Forest in Macon County. Over a six week period infusions made from three species of emergent vegetation in Culex larval habitats were tested against a standard hay infusion that has served as a successful ovipositional attractant in past seasons. Infusions of cattail, rush and sedge were tested for their ability to attract common Culex mosquitoes of medical importance. Culex restuans, Culex quinquefasciatus, Culex salinarius and Culex nigripalpus are primarily avian feeders and all are implicated in the transmission cycle of at least one disease. Improvements on the effectiveness of ovipositional attractants for these Culex species would benefit any mosquito borne disease monitoring agency.

Species 1: Diptera Culicidae Culex quinquefasciatus (southern house mosquito)
Species 2: Diptera Culicidae Culex salinarius
Species 3: Diptera Culicidae Culex restuans
Keywords: oviposition, attractant

Back to Ten-Minute Papers, Section D. Medical and Veterinary Entomology
Back to Ten-Minute Papers, Section D. Medical and Veterinary Entomology

Back to The 2003 ESA Annual Meeting and Exhibition