Lakeshore development causes lake ecosystem changes, such as the removal of sunken logs serving as aquatic habitat, reduced growth rates for sport-fish, and increased nutrient loadings. Land development constraints (LDCs) such as zoning and open space preservation represent community’s attempts to mitigate these effects. However, it is often unclear how effective these policies are in limiting ecological impacts. Our goal here was to first quantify the effects of LDCs on the frequency and size of subdivisions along lakefront lots in Results/Conclusions The subdivision/new parcel model predicted 98% of all subdivisions and 96% of all new parcels from1974-1998 correctly. In the counterfactual simulation, the number of subdivisions increases by over 20% and the total number of new lots increases by nearly 50% over the factual simulations. Using the simulated counterfactual landscape to generate housing density values, the bluegill growth rate model predicted bluegill growth rates to be 0-10% lower for the counterfactual model, compared to the original levels. This suggests that a change to state-mandated minimum frontage zoning would comprise bluegill growth substantially. Our approach highlights the virtues of a linked economic-ecological framework, where human actions are modeled on a landscape, and the results of these actions are quantified in ecological terms.