Results/Conclusions The PDE model and the best fitting matrix model of our previous work resulted in similar predictions; none matched the empirically measured transient dynamics. There are two possibilities for parameter estimation error: (1) The temperature during the parameter estimation experiments was about 2oC lower than during the experiment measuring the transient dynamics. (2) The parameter estimation was conducted on single feeding aphids, and it is possible that aphids benefit from feeding in small groups (Allee effect). Both a higher temperature and an Allee effect generally reduce developmental time and shift reproduction to earlier ages. Increasing the fecundity of the youngest adults from 4.8 to 5.5, followed by a drop in fecundity to keep the total fecundity the same, and decreasing developmental time from 10 to 8 days resulted in a perfect match of empirical results and model predictions. I used my model to predict population dynamics following the arrival of a single adult migrant. The predicted total population size after 20 days assuming transient dynamics was 6 times as high as predicted assuming asymptotic growth. In contrast, using the original parameter estimates the transient amplification caused population size to triple. Conclusion: Transient dynamics can be ecologically significant and high temperatures are likely to magnify the effect of transient dynamics.