Trapping mold mites, Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Schrank) (Acari: Acaridae) for IPM decisions in country ham facilities: Effects of trap placement and trap design

Monday, November 17, 2014
Exhibit Hall C (Oregon Convention Center)
Barbara Amoah , Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Thomas Phillips , Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Methyl bromide is the most effective fumigant used to manage infestation of the mold mite, Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Schrank) (Acari: Acaridae), a serious pest of dry-cured ham and other high protein and/or moisture foods.  However, methyl bromide is being banned as part of the Montreal Protocol, due to its ozone–depleting ability. Ham producers will therefore need to rely on other management methods. Currently, no Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program has been developed for this mite on ham. We addressed a critical aspect of IPM: monitoring. The KSU trap and a food-based lure developed in our laboratory, and four commercial stored-product pest traps of different designs: Dome, X-lure, BT, and Insect Ltd were used to determine the best trap placement and design that would maximize mite capture.  In a simulated environment, more mites were caught in KSU traps placed along wall than those away from wall (P <0.01). Mites were captured in KSU traps deployed at least six meters from a mite source within 24 hours. The KSU trap captured more mites than any of the commercial traps (P<0.01). Also, KSU traps deployed in light had more mites than those in total darkness and traps with violet light attached had more mites than those without violet light (P<0.01). To maximize trap’s sensitivity to mites, facility managers may place KSU traps along walls or other “edges”. This may help in more accurately predicting the population dynamics of the mite, hence, help determine when management is required.