2008 ESA Annual Meeting, November 16-19, 2008: Student Debate: The Impacts of Genetically Modified Organisms in Entomology
Start
|
Browse by Day
|
Author Index
Student Debate: The Impacts of Genetically Modified Organisms in Entomology
Organizers:
Anne L. Nielsen and Roxanne Burrus
0255
Student debate format introduction
Anne L. Nielsen
,
Rutgers University
0256
Introduction: Genetically modified disease vectors should be incorporated into vector-borne control programs because they decrease disease transmission and spread, while reducing environmental risk
Kimberly Skyrm
,
Oregon State University
;
Jennifer Bergh
,
Oregon State University
0266
Introduction: GMO's should be incorporated into management programs for insect pests to reduce insecticide use while providing acceptable protection against all pests and improve crop yield
David R. Coyle
,
University of Wisconsin
Audio File
0276
Introduction: Current evaluation procedures of GMOs are adequate to determine their long-term impacts on the environment and human health
Cheri Abraham
,
Mississippi State University
Audio File
Recorded presentation
0257
PRO: Genetically modified disease vectors should be incorporated into vector-borne control programs because they decrease disease transmission and spread, while reducing environmental risk
Gloria I. Giraldo-Calderón
,
Purdue University
;
Kapil Raje
,
Purdue University
;
Janice van Zee
,
Purdue University
;
Victoria Caceres
,
Purdue University
;
Venu Margam
,
Purdue University
;
Diana Castilho
,
Purdue University
Audio File
Recorded presentation
0267
PRO: GMOs should be incorporated into management programs for insect pests to reduce insecticide use while providing acceptable protection against all pests and improve crop yield
Andrew Boswell
,
Texas A&M
;
Therese Catanach
,
Texas A&M
;
Jordan Coburn
,
Texas A&M
;
Aubrey Colvin
,
Texas A&M
Audio File
Recorded presentation
0277
PRO: Current evaluation procedures of GMOs are adequate to determine their long-term impacts on the environment and human health
Jamie Fuest
,
University of Georgia
;
Shaku Nair
,
University of Georgia
;
Joseph Shimat Villanassery
,
University of Georgia
;
Krishna Bayareddy
,
University of Georgia
Audio File
Recorded presentation
0258
Cross-examination by CON Team: 1st debate
0268
Cross-examination by CON Team: 2nd debate
0278
Cross-examination by CON Team: 3rd debate
0259
CON: Genetically modified disease vectors should be incorporated into vector-borne control programs because they decrease disease transmission and spread, while reducing environmental risk
Lori R. Shapiro
,
Pennsylvania State University
;
Dan Schmehl
,
Pennsylvania State University
;
Maya Nehme
,
Pennsylvania State University
;
Robert Anderson
,
Pennsylvania State University
Audio File
Recorded presentation
0269
CON: GMO's should be incorporated into management programs for insect pests to reduce insecticide use while providing acceptable protection against all pests and improve yield
Ashfaq A. Sial
,
Washington State University
;
Bonnie Ohler
,
Washington State University
;
Jeremy Buchman
,
Washington State University
;
Nicolai Wiman
,
Washington State University
Audio File
Recorded presentation
0279
CON: Current evaluation procedures of GMOs are adequate to determine their long-term impacts on the environment and human health
Jonathan D. Willis
,
University of Tennessee
;
Paul Rhodes
,
University of Tennessee
;
Anais Torrijos Castagnola
,
University of Tennessee
;
Kristen Renee Abney
,
University of Tennessee
Audio File
Recorded presentation
0260
Cross-examination by PRO Team: 1st debate
0270
Cross-examination by PRO Team: 2nd debate
0280
Cross-examination by PRO Team: 3rd debate
0261
Rebuttal by PRO Team: 1st debate
0271
Rebuttal by PRO Team: 2nd debate
0281
Rebuttal by PRO Team: 3rd debate
0262
Rebuttal by CON Team: 1st debate
0272
Rebuttal by CON Team: 2nd debate
0282
Rebuttal by CON Team: 3rd debate
0263
2nd rebuttal by PRO Team: 1st debate
0273
2nd rebuttal by PRO Team: 2nd debate
0283
2nd rebuttal by PRO Team: 3rd debate
0264
2nd rebuttal by CON Team: 1st debate
0274
2nd rebuttal by CON Team: 2nd debate
0284
2nd rebuttal by CON Team: 3rd debate
0265
Judges' questions: 1st debate
0275
Judges' questions: 2nd debate
0285
Judges' questions: 3rd debate
Break
Break
Concluding Remarks
See more of:
Member Symposia
<< Previous Session
|
Next Session >>