Aaron J. Gassmann, aaronjg@iastate.edu, Iowa State University, Department of Entomology, 110 Insectary Bldg, Ames, IA, Yves Carrière, ycarrier@ag.arizona.edu, University of Arizona, Department of Entomology, Tucson, AZ, and Bruce E. Tabashnik, brucet@ag.arizona.edu, University of Arizona, Department of Entomology, 410 Forbes Bldg, Tucson, AZ.
We provide a synthetic review of the literature on fitness costs of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and the application of fitness costs in integrated resistance management. Evolution of resistance by insect pests threatens the continued effectiveness of Bt toxins in sprays and transgenic crops. Fitness costs of Bt resistance occur when, in the absence of Bt toxins, fitness is lower for resistant than for susceptible insects. Modeling results show that fitness costs can delay resistance by selecting against Bt-resistant genotypes in refuges where insects are not exposed to Bt toxins. In 77 studies including 18 species, fitness costs were detected in 62% of experiments testing for declines in resistance and in 34% of fitness component comparisons. Mean fitness costs were 15.5% for survival, 7.4% for development time, and 2.5% for mass. Although most fitness costs were recessive, nonrecessive costs can select more strongly against resistance. Because fitness costs vary with ecological conditions, refuges designed to increase the dominance or magnitude of fitness costs could be especially useful for delaying pest resistance.
Species 1: Lepidoptera Gelechiidae
Pectinophora gossypiella (pink bollworm)
Species 2: Lepidoptera Plutellidae
Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth)